“Interpreting The Day the Earth Stood Still for Contemporary Film Audiences” Review Essay

In the article â€Å"Interpreting The Day the Earth Stood Still for Contemporary Film Audiences† written in 2008, the Author, Joshua Pardon, expounds on the messages that were sent to the American film crowd of 1951 through the film The Day the Earth Stood Still, in view of a short story by Harry Bates written in 1940. These messages went from themes like the cultural expenses of nuclear innovation and both a negative and positive perspective on militarism, to analysis of the broad communications. He additionally expounds on how, not at all like TV shows, and stories by the time of increased birth rates age depicted the 1950’s as when everything was magnificent for each resident constantly, the contention can be made that it was a â€Å"strange and weird† time brimming with vulnerability, dread, and suspicion; and this film depicts these emotions, with solid messages that Pardon recommend could be applied to current world occasions. To improve you comprehend his article, he included a very elegantly composed summery of the film followed by understandings of the film’s scenes that could be applied to what was occurring in America in 1951 and occasions occurring in 2008. He analyzes the Cold War’s potential to prompt nuclear fiasco to the ebb and flow war on psychological warfare; the public’s disarray on whether to believe researcher to the ebb and flow discussion of undifferentiated cell inquire about, environmental change and the logical premise of development; and the media’s need to sensationalize recent developments detract from the main problems both in 1951 and today. I would need to state that Pardon’s article is persuading and elegantly composed; the measure of data given by the writer is palatable. There is a lot of foundation data on what were the recent developments during the 1950s on each translation on the not all that concealed messages of the film that permit you to see the closeness of today’s issues and unmistakably perceive how the film can be relatable today. Additionally, it goes into subtleties of each significant character, and even looks at characters to explicit famous individuals from tha t period, for example, Albert Einstein; and even the character Tom Stevens, an organization man with egotistical expectations as a negative depiction of an avaricious American business culture. Such extraordinary subtleties of understanding make this article an awesome and satisfying read. As I would like to think, the most fragile piece of this article is that, in spite of the fact that the data given permits you to illustrate what the writer is attempting to convey, it frequently included a lot of data of what nearly felt like unessential data. Furthermore, I felt that the writer bounced from one subject to the next,â just to bring it back up later in the article, and despite the fact that it wasn’t confounding and the data was consistently extraordinary, it caused the subject to feel excess. To summarize, Pardon’s article on the understanding of the film The Day the Earth Stood Still, was an enlightening and educational article that obviously shows all the political messages in the film. His words had the option to portray what was occurring in 1951, when the film was made, with the goal that you can more readily comprehend the messages that were being sen t by the film that permitted us to more readily perceive how, despite the fact that it had been more than 60 decades since this article was composed, the film is as yet important today.